odern archaeology is built upon the evolutionary assumption that man evolved from a stone age (lasting about 3.4 million years) to a bronze age (c.
- datingadd com
- dating agencies norfolk uk
- Punjabi sexi gril on wabcom
- kim chiu and simon atkins dating
- the college guide to dating
The evidence for Christ’s resurrection is irrefutable, as we have shown in this book. When someone invents a religion, he glorifies its leaders, but the four Gospels depict the founders of Christianity as very weak (e.g., Peter denying Christ thrice; the disciples fleeing and hiding; Thomas and others doubting Christ even after He appeared to them). On Christ’s authority alone we would trust the Bible and reject the skeptics.
Further, if men had made up the accounts of Christ’s resurrection in the Gospels, they would not have said that the women were the first to believe. In fact, dates for Hammurabi’s life differ more than 150 years among archaeologists, having been variously dated to 1848-1806 (long chronology), 1792-1750 (middle chronology), 1728-1686 (short chronology), and 1696-1654 (ultra-short chronology) (Paul Kriwaczek, , 2012, Kindle location 173).
Archaeologist John Laughlin lists two serious problems: First, a standard pottery type might have had many variants.
Second, similar ceramic types might not date to the same era; some types may have survived longer than others, and different manufacturing techniques and styles might have been introduced at different times in different locales.
Alan Millard warns: “[Pottery] cannot be very precise, for a fashion may last longer in one place than in another, and some evidence may be missed” (, p. The reason pottery is used so extensively as a dating method by archaeologists is not because it is precise, but because it is the best method that they have that can be applied to the largest number of archaeological sites. This is explained as follows:“There are two basic forms of carbon: one that occurs naturally, called carbon-12 (12C), and one that forms from processes acting on nitrogen in the atmosphere, called carbon-14 (14C).
Both of these combine with oxygen to form carbon dioxide (CO2), which we breathe out and plants take in.
Numerous archaeological discoveries give evidence of the use of copper during the period 4300-3000” (Joseph Free, The major supposed evidence that archaeologists use to discredit the Bible (other than the argument from silence) is their dating system, which often is contrary to the biblical dates. In John -41, Jesus quoted from both major sections of Isaiah and said both were written by the same prophet named Isaiah.
For the following important reasons we refuse to accept archaeological dates that contradict the Bible: Consider that in the 19th century, skeptics claimed that writing didn’t exist in Moses’ day. Of the authority of the Old Testament, Jesus said,“Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
They doubted the existence of Ur of the Chaldees, of the advanced ancient city-states and religious towers mentioned in Genesis 10-11, of complex legal codes in that era, of camels in Palestine in the days of Abraham, of King David and King Solomon, of the Hittites and the Philistines, of Sargon and Nebuchadnezzar and Belshazzar, to name a few. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled” (Mat. In this passage Jesus taught that the Old Testament is perfect even to the very letters.
They said that the book of Acts was filled with historical inaccuracies. He further said that “the scripture cannot be broken” (John ).
This striking candor is powerful evidence that the Gospels are true, unvarnished accounts. As George Hanson rightly said, “The simple faith of the Christian who believes in the resurrection is nothing compared to the credulity of the skeptic who will accept the wildest and most improbable romances rather than admit the plain witness of historical certainties. They apply their evolutionary assumptions to this and are convinced that they are looking at the advance of civilization from a “stone age.” Actually, while there were and are stone age people, there is no stone age.